Dynamic asymmetries in convergence eye movements under natural viewing conditions.
نویسندگان
چکیده
PURPOSE To clarify differences in the dynamics of convergence eye movements in response to symmetrical stimuli between the dominant eye and the nondominant eye under natural viewing conditions. METHODS This study was conducted in 11 normal volunteers (age range, 22-30 years). The subject was seated on a chair, and the head was fixed using a bite-block. The dominant eye was determined with the "hole-in-the-card" test. Horizontal positions of the eyes were recorded using an infrared reflection device. Recordings of right eye movements were subtracted from left eye movements to obtain the vergence response. The fixation target was moved toward the center of both eyes from 50 to 20 cm in front of the face at a constant velocity in five steps (20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 cm/s). The target was moved by a pulse motor controlled by a microcomputer. The dynamic properties of each eye movement and the vergence components were analyzed. RESULTS At velocities < or =40 cm/s, convergence responses consisted of two components: the fusion-initiating component and the fusion-sustaining component. The fusion-initiating component drove the initial faster dynamic portion of the response, and the fusion-sustaining component maintained the latter slower dynamic portion of the response. The mean peak velocity of the fusion-initiating component was significantly greater in the dominant eye than in the nondominant eye. The mean peak latency of the catch-up component was significantly shorter in the dominant eye than in the nondominant eye. CONCLUSIONS The present study indicated that the trajectory of convergence eye movement under natural viewing conditions consists of two components, the fusion-initiating component and the fusion-sustaining component, and that the convergence response to symmetric stimuli was asymmetric between the dominant eye and the nondominant eye during the fusion-initiating phase. The neural control system of convergence eye movements preferentially drives the dominant eye during the fusion-initiating phase of the response.
منابع مشابه
Dynamic asymmetries in disparity convergence eye movements
Vergence eye movements have traditionally been considered the product of a single neural control center and are usually studied by combining the movements of each eye into a single 'vergence' response. In the present experiment, disparity-driven eye movements were produced by symmetrical step stimuli, and the dynamic properties of each eye movement were analyzed separately. Although the final p...
متن کاملFixational eye movements during viewing of dynamic natural scenes
Even during periods of fixation our eyes undergo small amplitude movements. These movements are thought to be essential to the visual system because neural responses rapidly fade when images are stabilized on the retina. The considerable recent interest in fixational eye movements (FEMs) has thus far concentrated on idealized experimental conditions with artificial stimuli and restrained head m...
متن کاملVariability of eye movements when viewing dynamic natural scenes.
How similar are the eye movement patterns of different subjects when free viewing dynamic natural scenes? We collected a large database of eye movements from 54 subjects on 18 high-resolution videos of outdoor scenes and measured their variability using the Normalized Scanpath Saliency, which we extended to the temporal domain. Even though up to about 80% of subjects looked at the same image re...
متن کاملThe influence of head-mounted displays on head and eye movements during visual search
This report describes an eye-tracking experiment which was conducted in the context of the student project Analyse und Modellierung von Blickbewegungen (Analysis and Modeling of Eye Movements) in summer term 2009 at Bielefeld University. The goal was to determine the influence of headmounted displays (HMDs) on natural visual search behavior. Subjects were instructed to find a previously specifi...
متن کاملRole of eye movements in chromatic induction.
There exist large interindividual differences in the amount of chromatic induction [Vis. Res. 49, 2261 (2009)]. One possible reason for these differences between subjects could be differences in subjects' eye movements. In experiment 1, subjects either had to look exclusively at the background or at the adjustable disk while they set the disk to a neutral gray as their eye position was being re...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Japanese journal of ophthalmology
دوره 45 5 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2001